From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Beyond DPDK 2.0 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:33:36 -0700 Message-ID: References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D1A917@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D29B55@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D29B55-kPTMFJFq+rFP9JyJpTNKArfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" This does a good job of stating the need for action without getting into the details. Perhaps this would be better resolved by some more interactive discussion. I know it is hard to all get together, but there needs to be more some more creative and focused thought on this. A phone conference is just not enough. Alternatively, propose some options and vote, but I don't think we have things defined enough for that yet.