From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB718C11F65 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4191361444 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:23:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4191361444 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=iol.unh.edu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAD240141; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:23:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f41.google.com (mail-io1-f41.google.com [209.85.166.41]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF56D40040 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:23:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f41.google.com with SMTP id g22so3891224iom.1 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:23:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EKA9iHqza/Ij/OtBDp/u5jwtylCPAGy4Vy8dffqJ7uo=; b=dv3GsaDpWeLvfNisgu3/k4W2EgkduPU5AHn2TGrr/8pJY5+e5NS7ISS9azTei6v2RG 869Rqx87txhUN+339lA+Ze20GeqxVIYRxFcnikLut1l5KUlfZi1LkqhXyVGK3q1UcGDi CE0EfJ1RrXX1CjQofu+nYv7jQWjE3HaIzhz40= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EKA9iHqza/Ij/OtBDp/u5jwtylCPAGy4Vy8dffqJ7uo=; b=omwLca502I4S7cMbrHQgb5QiUQROZ0m13l9zZOLMWzYy/lGwasXICX3SHZ5KreJRjk QPFJomLUZDT9nRLtYugr1m99DZj9SR0uHh9pTY+u8/+mr//qLay/JMv90Y3IutHEEfp5 T4kShlj47na0i1jwTzZ2pk7nDVfJ22Ap2v3HYyKcwXcPeE3R1bdnOfU8pZFErmpZkXg8 cru0JFI6f7WqdJ/uwk89Ja8aBTGpxp4Mj0u2P3b3eu4EksrnkHM94wBq+8Lfxga+vXL8 5RHnHRDZn/WtzKVk3nwpMkhkfflsB29c3C4+T5/VPVaj5sydZPcrQ62H2gb3QNdHNhZE sZgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KYg83MqaFcr08S0shaKDaqGzAzcnp4R96ru01FisjC3a5gndB 6ISX58Go7wsE9RYXFXXRIuv6SS6Oxs8Iphk+v6mexg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyRTljfj79Acyqbhy96k6mA1I0QOT7KTCaTNqMj7NrfkBuDgS92dMLeudEwMlCYgI3GbG1xdw1ShiuF+EaF2Sc= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e013:: with SMTP id z19mr8409427iog.34.1625070226362; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:23:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0686a7c3fb3a22e37378a8545bc37bce04f4c391.1624481225.git.sthotton@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:23:09 -0400 Message-ID: To: Akhil Goyal Cc: Shijith Thotton , "dev@dpdk.org" , "ci@dpdk.org" , Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula , Anoob Joseph , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , "abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com" , Ankur Dwivedi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v2 2/2] drivers: add octeontx crypto adapter data path X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Akhil, I believe the FreeBSD 13 failure appeared because new requirements were added for drivers/event/octeontx. The ABI reference was taken at the v21.05 release which was able to build this driver at the time. I will try to look for a way to produce a real ABI test. Thanks, Brandon On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 4:54 AM Akhil Goyal wrote: > > > Added support for crypto adapter OP_FORWARD mode. > > > > As OcteonTx CPT crypto completions could be out of order, each crypto op > > is enqueued to CPT, dequeued from CPT and enqueued to SSO one-by-one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton > > --- > This patch shows a CI warning for FreeBSD, but was not able to locate the error/warning in the logs. > Can anybody confirm what is the issue? > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-June/200637.html > > Regards, > Akhil -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu