From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jianbo Liu Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] config/armv8a: disable igb_uio Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 10:01:05 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1462974479-26180-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <20160511082259.42905f98@xeon-e3> <20160511170215.GA1637@localhost.localdomain> <20160511112559.69dcff13@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Jerin Jacob , Hemant Agrawal , dev@dpdk.org, santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com, Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com (mail-yw0-f179.google.com [209.85.161.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD3868F5 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 04:01:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id j74so60506624ywg.1 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 19:01:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160511112559.69dcff13@xeon-e3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 12 May 2016 at 02:25, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2016 22:32:16 +0530 > Jerin Jacob wrote: > >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 08:22:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> > On Wed, 11 May 2016 19:17:58 +0530 >> > Hemant Agrawal wrote: >> > >> > > IGB_UIO not supported for arm64 arch in kernel so disable. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal >> > > Reviewed-by: Santosh Shukla >> > >> > Really, I have use IGB_UIO on ARM64 >> >> May I know what is the technical use case for igb_uio on arm64 >> which cannot be addressed through vfio or vfioionommu. > > I was running on older kernel which did not support vfioionommu mode. As I said, most of DPDK developers are not kernel developers. They may have their own kernel tree, and couldn't like to upgrade to latest kernel. They can choose to use or not use igb_uio when binding the driver. But blindly disabling it in the base config seems unreasonable.