From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian Subject: Re: Question on the Ring Library Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:58:02 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20131204132548.05a151fe@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20131204135125.0fb7bf3f@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131204135125.0fb7bf3f-We1ePj4FEcvRI77zikRAJc56i+j3xesD0e7PPNI6Mm0@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Understood. Thanks for getting back. Regards, Sambath On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Stephen Hemminger < stephen-OTpzqLSitTUnbdJkjeBofR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:47:10 -0800 > Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian wrote: > > > Thanks Stephen. I was going to do prototype something similar (not doing > > the wakeup inline but using a background thread) > > and is it a worthwhile effort to move this as a feature of the RTE ring > or > > is it best left at the application level. > > > > I prefer that RTE ring stays as simple as possible. > If you need a higher level abstraction, built it yourself >