From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Wiles, Keith" Subject: Re: [PATCH] validate_abi: build faster by augmenting make with job count Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:47:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1469034588-1847-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <6330653.K6A9CLrOZy@xps13> <20160720174849.GE28844@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Neil Horman , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Mcnamara, John" To: Neil Horman Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063523777 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:47:34 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20160720174849.GE28844@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <7F152377F59E3948883CE37B7301F505@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > On Jul 20, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Neil Horman wrote: >=20 > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 07:40:49PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 2016-07-20 13:09, Neil Horman: >>> From: Neil Horman >>>=20 >>> John Mcnamara and I were discussing enhacing the validate_abi script to= build >>> the dpdk tree faster with multiple jobs. Theres no reason not to do it= , so this >>> implements that requirement. It uses a MAKE_JOBS variable that can be = set by >>> the user to limit the job count. By default the job count is set to th= e number >>> of online cpus. >>=20 >> Please could you use the variable name DPDK_MAKE_JOBS? >> This name is already used in scripts/test-build.sh. >>=20 > Sure >=20 >>> +if [ -z "$MAKE_JOBS" ] >>> +then >>> + # This counts the number of cpus on the system >>> + MAKE_JOBS=3D`lscpu -p=3Dcpu | grep -v "#" | wc -l` >>> +fi >>=20 >> Is lscpu common enough? >>=20 > I'm not sure how to answer that. lscpu is part of the util-linux package= , which > is part of any base install. Theres a variant for BSD, but I'm not sure = how > common it is there. > Neil >=20 >> Another acceptable default would be just "-j" without any number. >> It would make the number of jobs unlimited. I think the best is just use -j as it tries to use the correct number of jo= bs based on the number of cores, right?