From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cisco Systems Inc. VIC Ethernet PMD - ENIC PMD Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:07:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1415390747-9532-1-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com> <1794590.eegJuKmrRB@xps13> <2661634.q9QAmChB5I@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2661634.q9QAmChB5I@xps13> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Thanks for the clear response. I=B9ll take a look at it. Regards, -Sujith On 10/11/14 3:33 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2014-11-10 09:27, Sujith Sankar: >> On 07/11/14 9:17 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" >>wrote: >> >It seems that this PMD is based on DPDK 1.7. >> >Could you rebase it on HEAD? >>=20 >> This patch is based on 1.7.1. Thought that is the latest. And I got >>the >> diff from origin. >> What made you feel that the patch is from 1.7? > >By saying 1.7, I meant 1.7.0 or 1.7.1. >In current HEAD (future 1.8.0), there is a lot of changes which make your >PMD >incompatible. That's why the rule is to base the patches on the latest >HEAD. > >Thanks for your efforts. >--=20 >Thomas