From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Wiles, Keith" Subject: Re: NO_AUTOLIB is this variable really needed? Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:26:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20150430162459.GB5708@bricha3-MOBL3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: "Richardson, Bruce" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150430162459.GB5708@bricha3-MOBL3> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <7540AD0B9662FB4D99EB6070B3EC7B90-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On 4/30/15, 11:24 AM, "Richardson, Bruce" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:55:47PM +0000, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> What is the NO_AUTOLIB variable used for anyway, the doc states this: >>=20 >>=20 >> * NO_AUTOLIBS: If set, the libraries provided by the framework will not >>be >> included in the LDLIBS variable automatically. >>=20 >> Why was this variable created, do we have really good reason? It seems >> like the variable removes almost all of the standard libs. >>=20 >>=20 >> Regards, >> ++Keith >>=20 >I think that is a hang-over from the baremetal days, and can probably go >away >now. [It was probably used for the loader app or something] Do we want me to submit a patch to remove it? A new patch set :-) > >/Bruce