From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: prepare to add E-switch
	rule	flags check
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:56:00 +0000
Message-ID: <DB7PR05MB44269EC3B1E40B93CBEC83FEC3C30@DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1541225876-8817-2-git-send-email-viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
 <1542052877-41512-1-git-send-email-viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
 <DB7PR05MB44269CCB20184D331C172C60C3C20@DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>, Slava Ovsiienko
 <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>, Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-eopbgr00056.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.0.56])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED1E1B11C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:56:01 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR05MB44269CCB20184D331C172C60C3C20@DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Tuesday, November 13, 2018 3:21 PM, Shahaf Shuler:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: prepare to add E-switch rul=
e
> flags check
>=20
> Monday, November 12, 2018 10:02 PM, Slava Ovsiienko:
> > Subject: [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: prepare to add E-switch rule flags
> > check
> >
> > The tc flower filter rules are used to control E-switch from the
> > application side. In order to gain garanteed rule hardware offload the
> > skip_sw flag should be specified while applying the rule. Some tc
> > rules is rejected by kernel if skip_sw flag is set by design.
> > Currently this regards VXLAN tunneling rules only, which are applied to
> special VXLAN virtual devices.
> >
> > Albeit these rules should be applied with no skip_sw flag set the
> > kernel tries to perform hardware offload. If kernel succeeded the
> > in_hw flag is set in rule properties and application may check this
> > flag to get know whether the applied rule is actually hardware offloade=
d.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> >
>=20
> Hi Slava,
> In general looks good. Please see few comments.
>=20
> In addition, please make the signed-of name and the author name match for
> the next version.

Series applied to next-net-mlx, with modification of the author name. Thank=
s.