From: "Robin Jarry" <rjarry@redhat.com>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH dpdk v5] net/tap: add software MAC address filtering
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 10:15:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHCLM2X3MS7B.3OVNTO4ILW98O@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325094019.3f4b8b81@phoenix.local>
Stephen Hemminger, Mar 25, 2026 at 17:40:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 20:09:16 +0100
> Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Linux TAP devices deliver all packets to userspace regardless of the
>> PROMISC/ALLMULTI flags on the interface. When promiscuous mode is
>> disabled, drop received packets whose destination MAC does not match
>> any configured unicast or multicast address.
>>
>> The receive path checks the destination MAC against the device's
>> unicast address table (managed by the ethdev layer), the multicast
>> address list (stored by the driver since the ethdev layer does not keep
>> a copy), and accepts broadcast unconditionally. Promiscuous and
>> all-multicast modes bypass the respective checks.
>>
>> To support multiple unicast addresses via rte_eth_dev_mac_addr_add(),
>> allocate mac_addrs with rte_zmalloc (TAP_MAX_MAC_ADDRS=16) instead of
>> pointing into dev_private, and advertise the new limit in dev_infos_get.
>>
>> Add a test to ensure it works as expected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>
>> ---
>
> Looks good, willing to merge this version.
>
> AI review found some other small things; but these could be addressed later.
> Warnings 2 and 3 look like just nuisance stuff.
Hey Stephen, thanks for reviewing.
> 1. **Resource leak in `tap_set_mc_addr_list()` on `rte_realloc()` failure.**
> `rte_realloc()` returns NULL on failure but does NOT free the original allocation. The code assigns the result directly back to `pmd->mc_addrs`, so when it returns NULL the pointer to the old allocation is lost and leaked.
I can send a v6 with this fix.
> 2. **fd leak in `tap_inject_packet()` on error after `socket()`.**
> If `bind()` or `send()` fails, `TEST_ASSERT` causes an immediate return without closing `fd`. This is test code so the impact is minor, but the fd leaks on every failed assertion after the socket is opened.
>
> Suggest using a local `goto cleanup` pattern or closing `fd` before each `TEST_ASSERT`.
This seems not important for test code.
> 2. **`rte_malloc` used for `mc_addrs` in `tap_set_mc_addr_list()`.** The multicast address list is a control-path data structure not accessed by DMA and not shared between processes (it's in `pmd_internals`, which is `dev_private`). Standard `malloc`/`realloc`/`free` would be more appropriate per DPDK guidelines, and would avoid consuming hugepage memory. If `rte_malloc` is kept, the leak fix above needs to use `rte_free` for cleanup, which it already would since the old pointer came from `rte_realloc`.
I don't mind, but it seems pedantic.
> 3. **Broadcast check could be moved before the `mc_addrs` loop.** In `tap_mac_filter_match()`, broadcast frames (which are a subset of multicast) traverse the entire `mc_addrs` loop before hitting the `rte_is_broadcast_ether_addr()` check at the end. Moving the broadcast check before the loop would avoid unnecessary iterations for a common packet type:
I can change this.
Let me know if you want a respin.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 22:10 [PATCH dpdk] net/tap: add software MAC address filtering Robin Jarry
2026-03-19 22:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-20 8:26 ` Robin Jarry
2026-03-20 10:10 ` Morten Brørup
2026-03-20 16:45 ` [PATCH dpdk v2] " Robin Jarry
2026-03-21 2:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-21 5:48 ` Morten Brørup
2026-03-21 14:48 ` [PATCH dpdk v3] " Robin Jarry
2026-03-21 17:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-21 23:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-23 8:42 ` [PATCH dpdk v4] " Robin Jarry
2026-03-23 18:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-24 19:09 ` [PATCH dpdk v5] " Robin Jarry
2026-03-25 16:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-26 9:15 ` Robin Jarry [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHCLM2X3MS7B.3OVNTO4ILW98O@redhat.com \
--to=rjarry@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox