From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shreyansh Jain Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:34:46 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1480846288-2517-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> <1697fe66-962d-0848-5e68-615249b52dad@nxp.com> <1524529.OpOKghfniY@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Marchand , To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr720062.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.72.62]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE6636E for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 06:02:02 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1524529.OpOKghfniY@xps13> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wednesday 07 December 2016 06:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-12-07 18:40, Shreyansh Jain: >> Is there anything specific that you are looking for in patchset v2? >> I was thinking of: >> 0. fixing BSD compilation issue reported by CI >> 1. improving the test_pci.c >> 2. hotplugging >> 3. trying to move PCI to drives/bus/pci/linux/* and resolving how >> drivers link to it, and how EAL resources like devargs are consumed. > > I am concerned about the time needed for all these changes. > Please let's make sure that the basic parts are well done and pushed, first. > That's why I suggest to postpone 1, 2 and 3 to next release if possible. > The priority is to have a clean bus model, > and if time permits, integrate the NXP driver. > I am absolutely OK with this. Just a confirmation, though. Is it OK to have a broken test_pci.c (1) in a series? It is not getting compiled by default, but it would definitely not work if compiled (symbols are missing).