From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] doc: add SPDX Licence to doc files
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:54:57 +0100
Message-ID: <a32d98be-ccbb-8dad-388f-f4d10f093118@intel.com>
References: <20180409131113.20729-1-marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 john.mcnamara@intel.com
To: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319F41B7EA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  9 Apr 2018 15:55:00 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20180409131113.20729-1-marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 4/9/2018 2:11 PM, Marko Kovacevic wrote:
> Added SPDX headers to doc files to have them aligned with
> the other doc files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>

<...>

>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst           | 3 +++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_07.rst           | 3 +++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst           | 3 +++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_02.rst           | 3 +++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_05.rst           | 3 +++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_08.rst           | 3 +++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_11.rst           | 3 +++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.rst           | 3 +++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst             | 3 +++

Hi Hemant,

What does it mean to have a license header in release notes?
It looks unnecessary from both license and copyright point of view, is there a
legal requirement for it?

Indeed I was thinking removing the header from the release notes that has it...

Thanks,
ferruh