From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: vf init issue with patch igb_uio: issue FLR during open and release of device file Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:25:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1836615.UbEDzhAzGh@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Tan, Jianfeng" , "Thotton, Shijith" , "Hu, Xuekun" , "Patil, Harish" , Gregory Etelson , "stable@dpdk.org" To: "Yang, Qiming" , Thomas Monjalon Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 9/15/2017 10:18 AM, Yang, Qiming wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] >> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 4:43 PM >> To: Yang, Qiming >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng ; Thotton, Shijith >> ; Hu, Xuekun ; Yigit, >> Ferruh ; Patil, Harish ; >> Gregory Etelson ; stable@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vf init issue with patch igb_uio: issue FLR during open >> and release of device file >> >> Hi >> >> 15/09/2017 10:04, Yang, Qiming: >>> Hi, Thomas >>> We meet a urgent issue because of Shijith's patch. >>> When use DPDK version 17.08, DPDK VF driver and kernel PF driver, i40e, ixgbe >> and qede(Harish said) VF all meet initial failure. >> >> This patch has been integrated in DPDK 17.08-rc2 (2 months ago). >> Why a so obvious issue is discovered only now? >> >>> This issue only occurred when use 17.08 igb_uio, vfio-pci and 17.05 igb_uio all >> works well. >>> Considering this issue will block our vf driver develop and test work, could we >> revert this patch first and find another appropriate way? >> >> We need to be sure the revert is the right solution because it will be backported >> to the stable 17.08 release. >> >> Shijith suggests to "try removing pci_reset_function from igbuio_pci_open." >> Can we try this first? >> Are we sure the bug is not in new firmwares? > > I have tried to remove pci_reset_function, it works in my environment, but it doesn't work in someone's enviroment. > And removing this function won't it changes the original purpose of his patch? So I'm not sure it is a good solution. Yes, removing that will be functionally almost same with revert. > This bug is not a firmware version related issue, we can reproduce stably with older firmware. I also think this is not related to the firmware. But I don't see why works with one version of the Linux PF driver, but not other. > > Qiming >