From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: DPDK Release Status Meeting 21/2/2019
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:27:32 +0000
Message-ID: <a82d2d1bed9e1250b2afd5ba643781487131447b.camel@debian.org>
References: <83259c98-9d32-02d8-fe09-d67839658eca@intel.com>
 <3eff7705bf6958382a727d35f786469a83479b1c.camel@debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, Thomas Monjalon
 <thomas@monjalon.net>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com (mail-wr1-f65.google.com
 [209.85.221.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68C22C52
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2019 16:27:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id f14so13883968wrg.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 07:27:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3eff7705bf6958382a727d35f786469a83479b1c.camel@debian.org>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 17:43 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 16:09 +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > Minutes 21 February 2019
> > ------------------------
>=20
> cut
>=20
> > * Coverity is partially back, but new analyses aren't running
> >   * Looking for suggestions from the community for a better or more
> > stable
> >   solutions
>=20
> The clang-based alternative I mentioned that can be used from
> Travis/Github is sonarcloud.io:
>=20
> https://sonarcloud.io/
>=20
> Here's an example implementation:
>=20
> https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/commit/4d3516f634a4a5e3f522f5cb277da38b1=
88d32eb

I've tested Sonarcloud, they are saying DPDK stinks (22000 code smells
flagged) :-)

https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=3Dbluca_dpdk

It seems the main "security" issues it highlights are the usage of
sprintf, strcpy and strcat. They can probably be easily filtered out.

The job on Travis takes about half an hour, so perhaps it's better as a
weekly run.

Integration is quite simple, based on the yet unmerged Travis patch:

https://github.com/bluca/dpdk/commit/ef4f3c8bdc1b044e19d466efb9ba6fc0a3af42=
20

--=20
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi