From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] new mlx4 datapath bypassing ibverbs Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 23:37:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1507027711-879-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> <1507153746-31255-1-git-send-email-ophirmu@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon , Olga Shern , Matan Azrad To: Ophir Munk , Adrien Mazarguil Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8AC2B9E for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 00:37:22 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1507153746-31255-1-git-send-email-ophirmu@mellanox.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/4/2017 10:48 PM, Ophir Munk wrote: > Changes from v2: > * Split "net/mlx4: support multi-segments Rx" commit from "net/mlx4: get back Rx flow functionality" commit > * Semantics, code styling > * Fix check-git-log warnings > * Fix checkpatches warnings > > Next (currently not included) changes: > * Replacing MLX4_TRANSPOSE() macro (Generic macro to convert MLX4 to IBV flags) with a look-up table as in mlx5 > for example: mlx5_set_ptype_table() function - in order to improve performance. > This change is delicate and should be verified first with regression tests > > * PMD documentation update when no longer working with MLNX_OFED > Documentation updtes require specific kernel, rdma_core and FW versions as well as installation procedures. > These details should be supplied by regression team. > > Moti Haimovsky (6): > net/mlx4: add simple Tx bypassing ibverbs > net/mlx4: get back Rx flow functionality > net/mlx4: support multi-segments Tx > net/mlx4: get back Tx checksum offloads > net/mlx4: get back Rx checksum offloads > net/mlx4: add loopback Tx from VF > > Vasily Philipov (1): > net/mlx4: support multi-segments Rx Adried looks like beat you with a few hours :) Can you please clarify which set is valid one, thanks.