RE: [PATCH 2/4] test: bpf check that JIT was generated

[Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Monday 8 June 2026 21:29
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>; Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>;
> Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] test: bpf check that JIT was generated
> 
> Avoid silently ignoring JIT failures. The test cases should
> all succeed JIT compilation; if not it is a bug in the JIT
> implementation and should be reported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
>  app/test/test_bpf.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_bpf.c b/app/test/test_bpf.c
> index dd24722450..79d547dc82 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_bpf.c
> @@ -3508,6 +3508,14 @@ run_test(const struct bpf_test *tst)
>  				rv, strerror(rv));
>  		}
>  	}
> +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> +	else {
> +		/* a JIT backend exists for this arch, so it must compile */
> +		printf("%s@%d: %s: no JIT code generated;\n",
> +			__func__, __LINE__, tst->name);
> +		ret = -1;
> +	}
> +#endif
> 
>  	rte_bpf_destroy(bpf);
>  	return ret;
> --
> 2.53.0

Acked-by: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>