From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] net/intel: fixes and improvements to rx path selection
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 14:33:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPD0IFUm6p67abAz@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015100723.1603296-1-ciara.loftus@intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:07:16AM +0000, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> This series contains a number of fixes and improvements to the logic
> concerned with selecting an rx path in the intel drivers.
>
> Patch 1 fixes incorrect behaviour in the ci_rxq_vec_capable function
> which would disqualify rxqs that have the timestamp offload enabled from
> selecting vector paths. This was incorrect because iavf vector paths
> support timestamp offload.
>
> Patch 2 removes a reduntant check from the ci_rxq_vec_capable function
> that disqualifies rxqs that have the buffer split offload enabled from
> selecting vector paths. This check is performed during the common rx
> path selection for three of the drivers and during dev_configure for the
> fourth, so the check in ci_rxq_vec_capable is unneeded. Although it is
> similar this patch was kept separate from patch 1 because it is only
> relevant after the three aformention drivers adopted the common rx path
> selection infrastructure, whereas patch 1 is a fix for an issue that
> existed prior to that.
>
> Patches 3 and 4 make fixes to the iavf rx path definitions, ensuring the
> correct offloads and features are defined for all paths.
>
> The final three patches reformat the arrays in the i40e iavf and ice
> drivers that hold information for each Rx path that are used in the
> common selection process, in an attempt to improve readability.
>
> v2:
> * Added a new patch (2) that removes the reduntant check for the buffer
> split offload in the common function.
> * Removed the useless defines IAVF_RX_NO_OFFLOADS and ICE_RX_NO_OFFLOADS
> * Use a newline for closing braces in the rx path infos arrays
> * Let a simd width of zero represent scalar paths instead of 64 which
> lessens the number of fields that need to be initialised for scalar path
> definitions
>
> Ciara Loftus (7):
> net/intel: fix Rx vector capability detection
> net/intel: remove redundant Rx offload check
> net/iavf: fix Rx paths feature definitions
> net/iavf: fix Rx path selection for scalar flex bulk alloc
> net/iavf: reformat the Rx path infos array
> net/i40e: reformat the Rx path infos array
> net/ice: reformat the Rx path infos array
>
Series-acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel, but with patches 1 & 2 squashed into one. I
don't think that we need two patches to remove the conditional, it's a
basic enough change to do in one.
Thanks,
/Bruce
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 8:45 [PATCH 0/6] net/intel: fixes and improvements to rx path selection Ciara Loftus
2025-10-14 8:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] net/intel: fix Rx vector capability detection Ciara Loftus
2025-10-14 14:16 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-14 14:59 ` Loftus, Ciara
2025-10-14 8:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] net/iavf: fix Rx paths feature definitions Ciara Loftus
2025-10-14 14:26 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-14 8:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] net/iavf: fix Rx path selection for scalar flex bulk alloc Ciara Loftus
2025-10-14 14:33 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-14 8:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] net/iavf: reformat the Rx path infos array Ciara Loftus
2025-10-14 14:38 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-14 8:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] net/i40e: " Ciara Loftus
2025-10-14 14:38 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-14 8:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] net/ice: " Ciara Loftus
2025-10-14 14:39 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] net/intel: fixes and improvements to rx path selection Ciara Loftus
2025-10-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] net/intel: fix Rx vector capability detection Ciara Loftus
2025-10-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] net/intel: remove redundant Rx offload check Ciara Loftus
2025-10-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] net/iavf: fix Rx paths feature definitions Ciara Loftus
2025-10-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] net/iavf: fix Rx path selection for scalar flex bulk alloc Ciara Loftus
2025-10-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] net/iavf: reformat the Rx path infos array Ciara Loftus
2025-10-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] net/i40e: " Ciara Loftus
2025-10-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] net/ice: " Ciara Loftus
2025-10-16 13:33 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPD0IFUm6p67abAz@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).