From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] net/ice: get link status updates via adminq message
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 15:15:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aameL_9QgoD79gjM@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8z2vGkbe+HKDqiO2cvhxKJRjM1Ghc=F_YmOZj8zg-Ak0g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 01:53:25PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2026 at 17:22, Bruce Richardson
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > As explained in patch 2, change the link status tracking to be via receipt
> > of an adminq message rather than directly querying the link status on
> > interrupt. As part of this change, we can reduce the cost of using the
> > adminq by removing the need to allocate and free memory but instead just
> > use the stack to store any received adminq messages.
> >
> > V4: resubmit to recheck in CI, now that next-net-intel tree is clean
> >
> > V3: added patch 1 to reduce cost of querying the adminq.
> >
> > v2: rebase on next-net-intel
> >
> > Bruce Richardson (2):
> > net/ice: remove malloc call for admin queue msg
> > net/ice: get link status updates via adminq message
> >
> > drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.c | 62 ++++++++++--------------------
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> Did a quick test with 2 E810 25G ports connected to another E810, with
> and without LSC interrupt in testpmd, and in OVS.
> Those ports link status gets updated quickly in all scenarios.
> I did not test on a long duration, nor with other types of interrupts
> in the mix.
>
> For the series,
> Tested-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>
Series applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
/Bruce
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 11:02 [PATCH] net/ice: get link status updates via adminq message Bruce Richardson
2026-02-27 11:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2026-03-02 11:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Bruce Richardson
2026-03-02 11:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] net/ice: remove malloc call for admin queue msg Bruce Richardson
2026-03-02 11:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net/ice: get link status updates via adminq message Bruce Richardson
2026-03-03 16:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Bruce Richardson
2026-03-03 16:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] net/ice: remove malloc call for admin queue msg Bruce Richardson
2026-03-04 11:59 ` Loftus, Ciara
2026-03-03 16:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] net/ice: get link status updates via adminq message Bruce Richardson
2026-03-04 11:56 ` Loftus, Ciara
2026-03-04 9:58 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Bruce Richardson
2026-03-05 12:53 ` David Marchand
2026-03-05 15:15 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aameL_9QgoD79gjM@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox