From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: filter destroy event before probed
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:38:27 +0100
Message-ID: <ac39254f-53ad-1a59-2681-fe5347d826e2@intel.com>
References: <20181024131232.6146-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
 Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AED54AE
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:38:30 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20181024131232.6146-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 10/24/2018 2:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> If a port is being created and rollbacked because of an error,
> the event RTE_ETH_EVENT_DESTROY should not be sent.
> It makes no sense to receive a destroy event for a port which
> was not yet announced via RTE_ETH_EVENT_NEW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>