From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: <pravin.bathija@dell.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
<stephen@networkplumber.org>, <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 4/5] vhost_user: Function defs for add/rem mem regions
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 12:16:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac6fc65a-a736-465c-9cdb-973f20327bed@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506033733.972952-5-pravin.bathija@dell.com>
The 3/5 commit is helper function, I doubt it could compile, why not merge with this commit.
I suggest placing the refactored code on 3/5, but it should be self-contained and not include
functions that will not be used in 3/5 (e.g. remove_guest_pages).
On 5/6/2026 11:37 AM, pravin.bathija@dell.com wrote:
> From: Pravin M Bathija <pravin.bathija@dell.com>
>
> These changes cover the function definition for add/remove memory
> region calls which are invoked on receiving vhost user message from
> vhost user front-end (e.g. Qemu). In our case, in addition to testing
> with qemu front-end, the testing has also been performed with libblkio
> front-end and spdk/dpdk back-end. We did I/O using libblkio based device
> driver, to spdk based drives.
> There are also changes for set_mem_table and new definition for get memory
> slots. Our changes optimize the set memory table call to use common support
> functions. A new vhost_user_initialize_memory() function is introduced to
> factor out the common memory initialization logic from the function
> vhost_user_set_mem_table(), which is now called from both the SET_MEM_TABLE
> message handler and the ADD_MEM_REG handler (for the first region).
> Message get memory slots is how the vhost-user front-end queries the
> vhost-user back-end about the number of memory slots available to be
> registered by the back-end. In addition support function to invalidate
> vring is also defined which is used in add/remove memory region functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pravin M Bathija <pravin.bathija@dell.com>
> ---
> lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 311 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 278 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
> index 9f1abb1842..c6b404da75 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_SET_FEATURES, vhost_user_set_features, false, t
> VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_SET_OWNER, vhost_user_set_owner, false, true) \
> VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER, vhost_user_reset_owner, false, false) \
> VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE, vhost_user_set_mem_table, true, true) \
> +VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_GET_MAX_MEM_SLOTS, vhost_user_get_max_mem_slots, false, false) \
> +VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG, vhost_user_add_mem_reg, true, true) \
> +VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG, vhost_user_rem_mem_reg, true, true) \
> VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_BASE, vhost_user_set_log_base, true, true) \
> VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_FD, vhost_user_set_log_fd, true, true) \
> VHOST_MESSAGE_HANDLER(VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_NUM, vhost_user_set_vring_num, false, true) \
> @@ -1431,6 +1434,52 @@ vhost_user_mmap_region(struct virtio_net *dev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int
> +vhost_user_initialize_memory(struct virtio_net **pdev)
> +{
> + struct virtio_net *dev = *pdev;
> + int numa_node = SOCKET_ID_ANY;
> +
> + if (dev->mem != NULL) {
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR,
> + "memory already initialized, free it first");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If VQ 0 has already been allocated, try to allocate on the same
> + * NUMA node. It can be reallocated later in numa_realloc().
> + */
> + if (dev->nr_vring > 0)
> + numa_node = dev->virtqueue[0]->numa_node;
> +
> + dev->nr_guest_pages = 0;
> + if (dev->guest_pages == NULL) {
> + dev->max_guest_pages = 8;
> + dev->guest_pages = rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL,
> + dev->max_guest_pages *
> + sizeof(struct guest_page),
> + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
> + numa_node);
> + if (dev->guest_pages == NULL) {
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR,
> + "failed to allocate memory for dev->guest_pages");
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + dev->mem = rte_zmalloc_socket("vhost-mem-table", sizeof(struct rte_vhost_memory) +
> + sizeof(struct rte_vhost_mem_region) * VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS, 0, numa_node);
> + if (dev->mem == NULL) {
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR, "failed to allocate memory for dev->mem");
> + rte_free(dev->guest_pages);
> + dev->guest_pages = NULL;
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int
> vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct virtio_net **pdev,
> struct vhu_msg_context *ctx,
> @@ -1439,7 +1488,6 @@ vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct virtio_net **pdev,
> struct virtio_net *dev = *pdev;
> struct VhostUserMemory *memory = &ctx->msg.payload.memory;
> struct rte_vhost_mem_region *reg;
> - int numa_node = SOCKET_ID_ANY;
> uint64_t mmap_offset;
> uint32_t i;
> bool async_notify = false;
> @@ -1484,39 +1532,13 @@ vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct virtio_net **pdev,
> if (dev->features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM))
> vhost_user_iotlb_flush_all(dev);
>
> - free_mem_region(dev);
> + free_all_mem_regions(dev);
> rte_free(dev->mem);
> dev->mem = NULL;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * If VQ 0 has already been allocated, try to allocate on the same
> - * NUMA node. It can be reallocated later in numa_realloc().
> - */
> - if (dev->nr_vring > 0)
> - numa_node = dev->virtqueue[0]->numa_node;
> -
> - dev->nr_guest_pages = 0;
> - if (dev->guest_pages == NULL) {
> - dev->max_guest_pages = 8;
> - dev->guest_pages = rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL,
> - dev->max_guest_pages *
> - sizeof(struct guest_page),
> - RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
> - numa_node);
> - if (dev->guest_pages == NULL) {
> - VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR,
> - "failed to allocate memory for dev->guest_pages");
> - goto close_msg_fds;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - dev->mem = rte_zmalloc_socket("vhost-mem-table", sizeof(struct rte_vhost_memory) +
> - sizeof(struct rte_vhost_mem_region) * memory->nregions, 0, numa_node);
> - if (dev->mem == NULL) {
> - VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR, "failed to allocate memory for dev->mem");
> - goto free_guest_pages;
> - }
> + if (vhost_user_initialize_memory(pdev) < 0)
> + goto close_msg_fds;
>
> for (i = 0; i < memory->nregions; i++) {
> reg = &dev->mem->regions[i];
> @@ -1580,11 +1602,9 @@ vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct virtio_net **pdev,
> return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK;
>
> free_mem_table:
> - free_mem_region(dev);
> + free_all_mem_regions(dev);
> rte_free(dev->mem);
> dev->mem = NULL;
> -
> -free_guest_pages:
> rte_free(dev->guest_pages);
> dev->guest_pages = NULL;
> close_msg_fds:
> @@ -1592,6 +1612,231 @@ vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct virtio_net **pdev,
> return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
> }
>
> +
> +static int
> +vhost_user_get_max_mem_slots(struct virtio_net **pdev __rte_unused,
> + struct vhu_msg_context *ctx,
> + int main_fd __rte_unused)
> +{
> + uint32_t max_mem_slots = VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS;
> +
> + ctx->msg.payload.u64 = (uint64_t)max_mem_slots;
> + ctx->msg.size = sizeof(ctx->msg.payload.u64);
> + ctx->fd_num = 0;
> +
> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +_dev_invalidate_vrings(struct virtio_net **pdev)
> +{
> + struct virtio_net *dev = *pdev;
> + uint32_t i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < dev->nr_vring; i++) {
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = dev->virtqueue[i];
> +
> + if (!vq)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (vq->desc || vq->avail || vq->used) {
> + vq_assert_lock(dev, vq);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the memory table got updated, the ring addresses
> + * need to be translated again as virtual addresses have
> + * changed.
> + */
> + vring_invalidate(dev, vq);
> +
> + translate_ring_addresses(&dev, &vq);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + *pdev = dev;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Macro wrapper that performs the compile-time lock assertion with the
> + * correct message ID at the call site, then calls the implementation.
> + */
> +#define dev_invalidate_vrings(pdev, id) do { \
> + static_assert(id ## _LOCK_ALL_QPS, \
> + #id " handler is not declared as locking all queue pairs"); \
> + _dev_invalidate_vrings(pdev); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +static int
> +vhost_user_add_mem_reg(struct virtio_net **pdev,
> + struct vhu_msg_context *ctx,
> + int main_fd __rte_unused)
> +{
> + uint32_t i;
> + struct virtio_net *dev = *pdev;
> + struct VhostUserMemoryRegion *region = &ctx->msg.payload.memory_single.region;
> +
> + /* convert first region add to normal memory table set */
> + if (dev->mem == NULL) {
> + if (vhost_user_initialize_memory(pdev) < 0)
> + goto close_msg_fds;
> + }
> +
> + /* make sure new region will fit */
> + if (dev->mem->nregions >= VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS) {
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR, "too many memory regions already (%u)",
> + dev->mem->nregions);
> + goto close_msg_fds;
> + }
> +
> + /* make sure supplied memory fd present */
> + if (ctx->fd_num != 1) {
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR, "fd count makes no sense (%u)", ctx->fd_num);
> + goto close_msg_fds;
> + }
> +
> + /* Make sure no overlap in guest virtual address space */
> + for (i = 0; i < dev->mem->nregions; i++) {
> + struct rte_vhost_mem_region *current_region = &dev->mem->regions[i];
> + uint64_t current_region_guest_start = current_region->guest_user_addr;
> + uint64_t current_region_guest_end = current_region_guest_start
> + + current_region->size - 1;
> + uint64_t proposed_region_guest_start = region->userspace_addr;
> + uint64_t proposed_region_guest_end = proposed_region_guest_start
> + + region->memory_size - 1;
> +
> + if (!((proposed_region_guest_end < current_region_guest_start) ||
> + (proposed_region_guest_start > current_region_guest_end))) {
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR,
> + "requested memory region overlaps with another region");
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR,
> + "\tRequested region address:0x%" PRIx64,
> + region->userspace_addr);
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR,
> + "\tRequested region size:0x%" PRIx64,
> + region->memory_size);
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR,
> + "\tOverlapping region address:0x%" PRIx64,
> + current_region->guest_user_addr);
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR,
> + "\tOverlapping region size:0x%" PRIx64,
> + current_region->size);
> + goto close_msg_fds;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* New region goes at the end of the contiguous array */
> + struct rte_vhost_mem_region *reg = &dev->mem->regions[dev->mem->nregions];
> +
> + reg->guest_phys_addr = region->guest_phys_addr;
> + reg->guest_user_addr = region->userspace_addr;
> + reg->size = region->memory_size;
> + reg->fd = ctx->fds[0];
> + ctx->fds[0] = -1;
> +
> + if (vhost_user_mmap_region(dev, reg, region->mmap_offset) < 0) {
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR, "failed to mmap region");
> + if (reg->mmap_addr) {
> + /* mmap succeeded but a later step (e.g. add_guest_pages)
> + * failed; undo the mapping and any guest-page entries.
> + */
> + remove_guest_pages(dev, reg);
> + free_mem_region(reg);
> + } else {
> + close(reg->fd);
> + reg->fd = -1;
> + }
> + goto close_msg_fds;
> + }
> +
> + dev->mem->nregions++;
> +
> + if (dev->async_copy && rte_vfio_is_enabled("vfio")) {
> + if (async_dma_map_region(dev, reg, true) < 0)
> + goto free_new_region;
It will invoke in goto label
> + }
> +
> + if (dev->postcopy_listening) {
> + /*
> + * Cannot use vhost_user_postcopy_register() here because it
> + * reads ctx->msg.payload.memory (SET_MEM_TABLE layout), but
> + * ADD_MEM_REG uses the memory_single payload. Register the
> + * single new region directly instead.
> + */
> + if (vhost_user_postcopy_region_register(dev, reg) < 0)
> + goto free_new_region;
> + }
> +
> + dev_invalidate_vrings(pdev, VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG);
> + dev = *pdev;
no need to do this, there are: struct virtio_net *dev = *pdev; in beginning
> + dump_guest_pages(dev);
> +
> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK;
> +
> +free_new_region:
> + if (dev->async_copy && rte_vfio_is_enabled("vfio"))
> + async_dma_map_region(dev, reg, false);
> + remove_guest_pages(dev, reg);
> + free_mem_region(reg);
> + dev->mem->nregions--;
> +close_msg_fds:
> + close_msg_fds(ctx);
> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +vhost_user_rem_mem_reg(struct virtio_net **pdev,
> + struct vhu_msg_context *ctx,
> + int main_fd __rte_unused)
> +{
> + uint32_t i;
> + struct virtio_net *dev = *pdev;
> + struct VhostUserMemoryRegion *region = &ctx->msg.payload.memory_single.region;
> +
> + if (dev->mem == NULL || dev->mem->nregions == 0) {
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR, "no memory regions to remove");
> + close_msg_fds(ctx);
no fd when remove, so please don't invoke close_msg_fds
> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < dev->mem->nregions; i++) {
> + struct rte_vhost_mem_region *current_region = &dev->mem->regions[i];
> +
> + /*
> + * According to the vhost-user specification:
> + * The memory region to be removed is identified by its GPA,
> + * user address and size. The mmap offset is ignored.
> + */
> + if (region->userspace_addr == current_region->guest_user_addr
> + && region->guest_phys_addr == current_region->guest_phys_addr
> + && region->memory_size == current_region->size) {
> + if (dev->async_copy && rte_vfio_is_enabled("vfio"))
> + async_dma_map_region(dev, current_region, false);
I'm afaid it not enough, we should drain DMA's pending request. But I think the original
impl also has this problem.
> + remove_guest_pages(dev, current_region);
> + free_mem_region(current_region);
> +
> + /* Compact the regions array to keep it contiguous */
> + if (i < dev->mem->nregions - 1) {
> + memmove(&dev->mem->regions[i],
> + &dev->mem->regions[i + 1],
> + (dev->mem->nregions - 1 - i) *
> + sizeof(struct rte_vhost_mem_region));
> + memset(&dev->mem->regions[dev->mem->nregions - 1],
> + 0, sizeof(struct rte_vhost_mem_region));
> + }
> +
> + dev->mem->nregions--;
> + dev_invalidate_vrings(pdev, VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG);
> + dev = *pdev;
no need to do this, there are: struct virtio_net *dev = *pdev; in beginning
> + close_msg_fds(ctx);
> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + VHOST_CONFIG_LOG(dev->ifname, ERR, "failed to find region");
> + close_msg_fds(ctx);
> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
> +}
> +
> static bool
> vq_is_ready(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 3:37 [PATCH v12 0/5] Support add/remove memory region and get-max-slots pravin.bathija
2026-05-06 3:37 ` [PATCH v12 1/5] vhost: add user to mailmap and define to vhost hdr pravin.bathija
2026-05-13 2:22 ` fengchengwen
2026-05-06 3:37 ` [PATCH v12 2/5] vhost_user: header defines for add/rem mem region pravin.bathija
2026-05-13 2:30 ` fengchengwen
2026-05-14 2:05 ` Bathija, Pravin
2026-05-06 3:37 ` [PATCH v12 3/5] vhost_user: support function defines for back-end pravin.bathija
2026-05-06 3:37 ` [PATCH v12 4/5] vhost_user: Function defs for add/rem mem regions pravin.bathija
2026-05-13 4:16 ` fengchengwen [this message]
2026-05-14 2:07 ` Bathija, Pravin
2026-05-06 3:37 ` [PATCH v12 5/5] vhost_user: enable configure memory slots pravin.bathija
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac6fc65a-a736-465c-9cdb-973f20327bed@huawei.com \
--to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=pravin.bathija@dell.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox