From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Daniels Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: prevent duplicate callback on list Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:35:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <1476915787-28205-1-git-send-email-daniels@research.att.com> <1476915787-28205-2-git-send-email-daniels@research.att.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093933D40B@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093933D428@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "Zhang, Helin" , "Iremonger, Bernard" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "ZELEZNIAK, ALEX" To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" Return-path: Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7598429CD for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:36:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, DANIELS, EDWARD S (EDWARD) wrote: > *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***. > Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. > > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > >> Hi Scott, >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Scott Daniels [mailto:daniels@research.att.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 10:11 AM >>> To: Lu, Wenzhuo >>> Cc: Zhang, Helin; Iremonger, Bernard; dev@dpdk.org; ZELEZNIAK, ALEX >>> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: prevent duplicate callback on list >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Scott, >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of E. Scott Daniels >>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 6:23 AM >>>>> To: Zhang, Helin; Iremonger, Bernard >>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; az5157@att.com; E. Scott Daniels >>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: prevent duplicate callback on >>>>> list >>>>> >>>>> This change prevents the attempt to add a structure which is already >>>>> on the callback list. If a struct with matching parameters is found >>>>> on the list, then no action is taken. If a struct with matching >>>>> parameters is found on the list, then no action is taken. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: E. Scott Daniels >>>> I think the fix itself is good. But 2 things, 1, normally we don't >>>> create a cover letter for a patch set which only has one patch. Just sending the >>> patch itself is enough. >>>> 2, ' net/ixgbe: ' in the title is used to describe the component. So the title >>> should be ' lib/ether: prevent duplicate callback on list'. >>>> Thanks. >>> >>> Thanks for the advice. My mistake on the component. Is there an easy way to >>> fix, or does it make sense just to nack this and I'll submit one with the correct >>> component. >> No need to NACK it. You can send a V2 with the correct component. And I think you can add my ack in the V2. >> Acked-by: Wenzhuo Lu >> >> BTW, I forgot to mention that as it's a fix. We always add a Fixes tag in the commit log. You can find the example from other one's mails :) > > Will do. The patch checker was squaking about the fixes tag and I remvoed > it :( So, I need to figure out what it didn't like about it and I'll fix > with a V2 and add your ack. Getting late here tonight, so tomorrow. > > Thanks > Scott V2 created, but with the change to the component the subject is different: [PATCH v2] lib/ether: prevent duplicate callback on list > > >> > >>> >>> Scott >>> >>>> >>>> >> >