From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net/i40e: fix MAC address removal
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 14:40:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ap6-zDJs_tJHR6Ci@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8x3QpkJxa3_crRLLHHKHscdceadDX2GEqEyN3sHU2DEYQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 03:21:27PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sept 2026 at 14:57, Bruce Richardson
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 01:17:23PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > > MAC addresses removal was tied with VMDq pools even when not used.
> > > So if VMDq is not enabled, no address would be ever removed.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9de506a6c781 ("ethdev: skip VMDq pools unless configured")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > I could not test the change as my setups are KO atm.
> > >
> > > Probably worth squashing in 9de506a6c781 before pulling to main
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > - fixed compilation,
> > >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > index b6b2d291ee..3c01354c39 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -4509,11 +4509,16 @@ i40e_macaddr_remove(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint32_t index)
> > > struct rte_ether_addr *macaddr;
> > > int ret;
> > > uint32_t i;
> > > + bool vmdq;
> > > uint64_t pool_sel;
> > >
> > > macaddr = &(data->mac_addrs[index]);
> > >
> > > - pool_sel = dev->data->mac_pool_sel[index];
> > > + vmdq = (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode & RTE_ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_FLAG) != 0;
> > > + if (!vmdq)
> > > + pool_sel = 1;
> > > + else
> > > + pool_sel = dev->data->mac_pool_sel[index];
> > >
> > The explanation makes sense, but do we really need the new temporary
> > variable, rather than just checking the flag directly in the "if"?
> >
> > Also, the rest of the code in this function, and the add function about it,
> > uses "pf->flags & I40E_FLAG_VMDQ" as a check for vmdq support. Is there a
> > reason we can't use that flag also here, rather than checking the rx
> > mq_mode flags?
>
> No, I just did not notice this internal flag and I simply used the
> ethdev level config.
>
> What do you think of:
>
> $ git diff next-net/for-main -- drivers/net/intel/i40e
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index b6b2d291ee..0d914d86ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -4513,6 +4513,12 @@ i40e_macaddr_remove(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> uint32_t index)
>
> macaddr = &(data->mac_addrs[index]);
>
> + if (!(pf->flags & I40E_FLAG_VMDQ)) {
> + if (i40e_vsi_delete_mac(pf->main_vsi, macaddr) != 0)
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to remove MACVLAN filter");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> pool_sel = dev->data->mac_pool_sel[index];
>
> for (i = 0; i < sizeof(pool_sel) * CHAR_BIT; i++) {
> @@ -4521,8 +4527,7 @@ i40e_macaddr_remove(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> uint32_t index)
> vsi = pf->main_vsi;
> else {
> /* No VMDQ pool enabled or configured */
> - if (!(pf->flags & I40E_FLAG_VMDQ) ||
> - (i > pf->nb_cfg_vmdq_vsi)) {
> + if (i > pf->nb_cfg_vmdq_vsi) {
> PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
> "No VMDQ pool
> enabled/configured");
> return;
>
>
That looks simpler. Thanks.
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 12:16 [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: fix MAC address removal David Marchand
2026-09-04 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/bnxt: " David Marchand
2026-09-04 13:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " David Marchand
2026-09-07 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 " David Marchand
2026-09-07 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/bnxt: " David Marchand
2026-09-07 17:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-09-07 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net/i40e: " Bruce Richardson
2026-09-07 13:21 ` David Marchand
2026-09-07 13:40 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2026-09-08 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 " David Marchand
2026-09-08 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net/bnxt: " David Marchand
2026-09-08 14:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-09-08 7:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] net/i40e: " Bruce Richardson
2026-09-08 14:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ap6-zDJs_tJHR6Ci@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox