From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
"Vipin Varghese" <vipin.varghese@amd.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal/x86: fix memcpy alignment mask definition
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 12:25:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apqqoMEC2AUBTYoL@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904111912.857547-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 11:19:12AM +0000, Morten Brørup wrote:
> An alignment mask (ALIGNMENT_MASK) is temporarily defined for internal
> purposes, but it is publicly exposed when including the header file,
> potentially colliding with existing definitions with the same name.
> Fixed this potential issue by adding the RTE_MEMCPY_ prefix to the
> definition.
>
> Furthermore, the superfluous function declaration at the top of the file
> was removed, and its description was moved to the function definition,
> to improve search results with source code browsers.
>
> Also, changed "!(addrs & MASK)" to "(addrs & MASK) == 0" to follow DPDK
> coding style.
>
> None of these changes should have any practical effect.
>
> Fixes: f5472703c0bd ("eal: optimize aligned memcpy on x86")
>
> Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Changed "!(addrs & MASK)" to "(addrs & MASK) == 0". (AI)
Did you miss this change in v2? I still see the "!" below.
> ---
> lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h | 37 +++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
> index 8ed8c55010..41fb08ab95 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
> @@ -32,21 +32,6 @@ extern "C" {
> #define RTE_MEMCPY_AVX
> #endif
>
> -/**
> - * Copy bytes from one location to another. The locations must not overlap.
> - *
> - * @param dst
> - * Pointer to the destination of the data.
> - * @param src
> - * Pointer to the source data.
> - * @param n
> - * Number of bytes to copy.
> - * @return
> - * Pointer to the destination data.
> - */
> -static __rte_always_inline void *
> -rte_memcpy(void *__rte_restrict dst, const void *__rte_restrict src, size_t n);
> -
> /**
> * Copy bytes from one location to another,
> * locations must not overlap.
> @@ -187,7 +172,7 @@ rte_mov256(uint8_t *__rte_restrict dst, const uint8_t *__rte_restrict src)
> * AVX512 implementation below
> */
>
> -#define ALIGNMENT_MASK 0x3F
> +#define RTE_MEMCPY_ALIGNMENT_MASK 0x3F
>
> /**
> * Copy 128-byte blocks from one location to another,
> @@ -333,7 +318,7 @@ rte_memcpy_generic_more_than_64(void *__rte_restrict dst, const void *__rte_rest
> * AVX implementation below
> */
>
> -#define ALIGNMENT_MASK 0x1F
> +#define RTE_MEMCPY_ALIGNMENT_MASK 0x1F
>
> /**
> * Copy 128-byte blocks from one location to another,
> @@ -444,7 +429,7 @@ rte_memcpy_generic_more_than_64(void *__rte_restrict dst, const void *__rte_rest
> * SSE implementation below
> */
>
> -#define ALIGNMENT_MASK 0x0F
> +#define RTE_MEMCPY_ALIGNMENT_MASK 0x0F
>
> /**
> * Macro for copying unaligned block from one location to another with constant load offset,
> @@ -673,6 +658,18 @@ rte_memcpy_aligned_more_than_64(void *__rte_restrict dst, const void *__rte_rest
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * Copy bytes from one location to another. The locations must not overlap.
> + *
> + * @param dst
> + * Pointer to the destination of the data.
> + * @param src
> + * Pointer to the source data.
> + * @param n
> + * Number of bytes to copy.
> + * @return
> + * Pointer to the destination data.
> + */
> static __rte_always_inline void *
> rte_memcpy(void *__rte_restrict dst, const void *__rte_restrict src, size_t n)
> {
> @@ -709,13 +706,13 @@ rte_memcpy(void *__rte_restrict dst, const void *__rte_restrict src, size_t n)
> }
>
> /* Implementation for size > 64 bytes depends on alignment with vector register size. */
> - if (!(((uintptr_t)dst | (uintptr_t)src) & ALIGNMENT_MASK))
> + if (!(((uintptr_t)dst | (uintptr_t)src) & RTE_MEMCPY_ALIGNMENT_MASK))
> return rte_memcpy_aligned_more_than_64(dst, src, n);
> else
> return rte_memcpy_generic_more_than_64(dst, src, n);
> }
>
> -#undef ALIGNMENT_MASK
> +#undef RTE_MEMCPY_ALIGNMENT_MASK
>
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 9:20 [PATCH] eal/x86: fix memcpy alignment mask definition Morten Brørup
2026-09-04 11:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Morten Brørup
2026-09-04 11:25 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2026-09-04 11:28 ` Morten Brørup
2026-09-04 11:31 ` [PATCH v3] " Morten Brørup
2026-09-04 11:34 ` [PATCH v4] " Morten Brørup
2026-09-07 14:10 ` Konstantin Ananyev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apqqoMEC2AUBTYoL@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=vipin.varghese@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox