From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Pravin Pathak <pravinpathakdev@gmail.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <jerinj@marvell.com>,
<tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>, <pravin.pathak.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] event/dlb2: race condition during dynamic linking
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 17:51:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ato_FWxmvDFdKfzY@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021172041.433881-1-pravin.pathak.dev@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 01:20:41PM -0400, Pravin Pathak wrote:
> dlb2 handles dynamic linking and linking asynchronously if queues
> being linked/unlinked have traffic. It starts a thread if not already
> started to handle the process. This change avoids the race condition
> in thread creation where sometimes the thread starts immediately,
> descheduling the calling thread and finishes the job and exits, and then
> caller sets worker launched true when the thread is not running.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pravin Pathak <pravin.pathak.dev@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/event/dlb2/pf/base/dlb2_osdep.h | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Fix makes sense to me. Note some comment inline below.
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/event/dlb2/pf/base/dlb2_osdep.h b/drivers/event/dlb2/pf/base/dlb2_osdep.h
> index 382a49090a..1505563f83 100644
> --- a/drivers/event/dlb2/pf/base/dlb2_osdep.h
> +++ b/drivers/event/dlb2/pf/base/dlb2_osdep.h
> @@ -208,14 +208,16 @@ static inline void os_schedule_work(struct dlb2_hw *hw)
>
> dlb2_dev = container_of(hw, struct dlb2_dev, hw);
>
> + dlb2_dev->worker_launched = true;
> +
> ret = rte_thread_create_internal_control(&complete_queue_map_unmap_thread,
> "dlb-qunmap", dlb2_complete_queue_map_unmap, dlb2_dev);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
DPDK coding style recommends using explicit comparisons for clarity, so
this should really be "if (ret != 0)" or "if (ret < 0)".
> DLB2_ERR(dlb2_dev,
> "Could not create queue complete map/unmap thread, err=%d\n",
> ret);
> - else
> - dlb2_dev->worker_launched = true;
> + dlb2_dev->worker_launched = false;
> + }
I notice that worker_launched is neither volatile nor atomic, so is
technically not suitable for communicating between threads - though in
practice it's presumably working fine here. Maybe look to make it atomic in
a future patch.
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 17:20 [PATCH v1] event/dlb2: race condition during dynamic linking Pravin Pathak
2026-10-22 16:46 ` Sarkar, Tirthendu
2026-10-23 12:49 ` Jerin Jacob
2026-10-22 16:51 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2026-10-27 21:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ato_FWxmvDFdKfzY@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=pravin.pathak.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=pravinpathakdev@gmail.com \
--cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox