From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] eventdev: Add eventdev ethernet Rx adapter Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:56:59 +0530 Message-ID: References: <04bcb240-51fb-50dc-833c-60c33a420d6f@intel.com> <1505328781-23456-1-git-send-email-nikhil.rao@intel.com> <79c5600e-173c-88a4-b5c7-3b21d3c15bf0@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gage.eads@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, harry.van.haaren@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, nipun.gupta@nxp.com, narender.vangati@intel.com, erik.g.carrillo@intel.com, abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com To: "Rao, Nikhil" , jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com Return-path: Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0063.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.63]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0021396 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:27:22 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <79c5600e-173c-88a4-b5c7-3b21d3c15bf0@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Friday 15 September 2017 04:40 PM, Rao, Nikhil wrote: > On 9/15/2017 11:40 AM, santosh wrote: >> Hi Nikhil, >> >> >> On Thursday 14 September 2017 12:23 AM, Nikhil Rao wrote: >>> Add common APIs for configuring packet transfer from ethernet Rx >>> queues to event devices across HW & SW packet transfer mechanisms. >>> A detailed description of the adapter is contained in the header's >>> comments. >>> >>> The adapter implementation uses eventdev PMDs to configure the packet >>> transfer if HW support is available and if not, it uses an EAL service >>> function that reads packets from ethernet Rx queues and injects these >>> as events into the event device. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao >>> Signed-off-by: Gage Eads >>> Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar >>> --- >> >> Can you pl. send whole series as v4. > Is that because the patch fails to compile ? > > As I mentioned in the cover letter, this patch does have a dependency on the latest service core API > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/073102.html > while reviewing I'm not sure [3/4] belongs to v1 or lartest v3, patch by date seems latest if so then deserve v4. Its upto you to consider suggestion! > Nikhil > >> Thanks. >> >> >