From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] lib/security: add support for get
	userdata
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:28:24 +0530
Message-ID: <b27a4357-bbe2-a07e-2b28-441c33e95340@nxp.com>
References: <1513326606-21970-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
 <1513327396-22178-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
 <1513327396-22178-2-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
 <917e0ed6-ef74-369b-8937-145e5fb928b5@nxp.com>
 <d133149a-a1b3-84ea-8127-13b507198812@caviumnetworks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, Narayana Prasad
 <narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>, Declan Doherty
 <declan.doherty@intel.com>, Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>, Sergio
 Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-sn1nam01on0041.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.41])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9FE1B01C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:58:30 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <d133149a-a1b3-84ea-8127-13b507198812@caviumnetworks.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Anoob,

On 12/15/2017 4:23 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote:
> Hi Akhil,
> 
> 
> On 12/15/2017 03:31 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
>> Hi Anoob,
>>
>> On 12/15/2017 2:13 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_security/rte_security_version.map 
>>> b/lib/librte_security/rte_security_version.map
>>> index e12c04b..87f35d7 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_security/rte_security_version.map
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_security/rte_security_version.map
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>>>       rte_security_session_stats_get;
>>>       rte_security_session_update;
>>>       rte_security_set_pkt_metadata;
>>> +    rte_security_get_userdata;
>> This should be in alphabetical order.
> Will update. Is there any such ordering followed in the placement of 
> APIs in various .c & .h files?

As per my understanding, alphabetical ordering is followed in all .map 
files and doc files in DPDK. For .c and .h, there is no such ordering.
>>>         local: *;
>>>   };
>>>
>>
> 
>