From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hemant Agrawal Subject: Re: [PATCH] config: add openssl in arm64-dpaa2-linuxapp-gcc Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:02:27 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20170728110738.28922-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com> <2464c136-7795-3fec-8ba8-5fa6147a998d@nxp.com> <6512004.RiLI2L5KfD@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , "Doherty, Declan" To: Thomas Monjalon , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , Akhil Goyal Return-path: Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0072.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.72]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4115C1B28A for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:32:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <6512004.RiLI2L5KfD@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/12/2017 6:31 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 06/09/2017 12:25, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: >> From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal@nxp.com] >>> >>> Hi Pablo, >>> On 9/4/2017 8:18 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote: >>>> From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal@nxp.com] >>>>> --- a/config/defconfig_arm64-dpaa2-linuxapp-gcc >>>>> +++ b/config/defconfig_arm64-dpaa2-linuxapp-gcc >>>>> @@ -90,3 +90,9 @@ >>>>> CONFIG_RTE_DPAA2_SEC_PMD_MAX_NB_SESSIONS=2048 >>>>> # >>>>> CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_EVENTDEV=y >>>>> CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_EVENTDEV_DEBUG=n >>>>> + >>>>> +# >>>>> +# Compile PMD for Software backed device # >>>>> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_OPENSSL=y >>>>> CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_OPENSSL_DEBUG=n >>>>> -- >>>>> 2.9.3 >>>> >>>> Is OpenSSL installed by default in that system, so this can be enabled by >>> default for this target? >>>> >>> yes this is installed by default. >> >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> Applied to dpdk-next-crypto. >> Thanks, > > Where is it installed by default? > On your machine? In your build system? > It is at least not installed on my machine when I compile this target. > > This file is a defconfig, not your preferred config. > > This patch should be dropped. > ok to drop.