From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Rybchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ethdev: add a function to look up Rx offload names Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:16:04 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1515658359-1041-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> <1515658359-1041-2-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> <1871861.OTzHAPg5Oj@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , Ferruh Yigit , Shahaf Shuler To: Thomas Monjalon , Ivan Malov Return-path: Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [148.163.129.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444ED1B00C for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:16:16 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1871861.OTzHAPg5Oj@xps> Content-Language: en-GB List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 01/17/2018 08:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, 2 comments below > > 11/01/2018 09:12, Andrew Rybchenko: >> From: Ivan Malov >> >> +#define RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(_name) \ >> + { DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_##_name, #_name } >> + >> +static const struct { >> + uint64_t offload; >> + const char *name; >> +} rte_rx_offload_names[] = { >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_STRIP), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(IPV4_CKSUM), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(UDP_CKSUM), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(TCP_CKSUM), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(TCP_LRO), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(QINQ_STRIP), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(MACSEC_STRIP), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(HEADER_SPLIT), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_FILTER), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_EXTEND), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(JUMBO_FRAME), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(CRC_STRIP), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(SCATTER), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(TIMESTAMP), >> + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(SECURITY), >> +}; >> + >> +#undef RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR > Why this undef? It is a constant-local macro with assumption to be used as initializer of the corresponding structure. So, under is just to limit its context and be sure that it is will not clash or be reused most likely in a wrong way. >> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_version.map >> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_version.map >> @@ -198,6 +198,12 @@ DPDK_17.11 { >> >> } DPDK_17.08; >> >> +DPDK_18.02 { >> + global: >> + >> + rte_eth_dev_rx_offload_name; >> +} DPDK_17.11; > New functions should be experimental. Thanks, I've moved it to EXPERIMENTAL and added a comment as highlighted by Ferruh in another review. I've not removed DPDK_17.11 base for EXPERIMENTAL in map file. If it should be done, it should be done separately. Thanks. >> EXPERIMENTAL { >> global: