From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Akhil Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/16] cryptodev: replace mbuf scatter gather flag Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:05:11 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20180608220234.10170-1-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <20180705020805.38308-1-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <20180705020805.38308-14-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Pablo de Lara , declan.doherty@intel.com, shally.verma@caviumnetworks.com, ravi1.kumar@amd.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, roy.fan.zhang@intel.com, fiona.trahe@intel.com, tdu@semihalf.com, jianjay.zhou@huawei.com Return-path: Received: from EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr40068.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.4.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CFF1BDDC for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:35:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180705020805.38308-14-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 7/5/2018 7:38 AM, Pablo de Lara wrote: > The current mbuf scatter gatter feature flag is > too ambiguous, as it is not clear if input and/or output > buffers can be scatter gather mbufs or not, plus > if in-place and/or out-of-place is supported. > > Therefore, five new flags will replace this flag: > - RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_IN_PLACE_SGL > - RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_SGL_OUT > - RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_FB_OUT > - RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_FB_IN_SGL_OUT > - RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_FB_IN_FB_OUT > > Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara > --- > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal