From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Remy Horton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] net/representor: Implement port representor PMD Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:02:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1510929733-7225-1-git-send-email-mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com> <1510929733-7225-4-git-send-email-mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com> <3098fb7d-02d5-e959-13ae-e9d93cdee0de@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Declan Doherty To: Ferruh Yigit , Mohammad Abdul Awal , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F3A14E8 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:02:48 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <3098fb7d-02d5-e959-13ae-e9d93cdee0de@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 20/11/2017 07:46, Ferruh Yigit wrote: [..] > Why we need this PMD? > It looks like this has been used only for parameter parsing. > > Can it be possible to rte_representor_broker_init() will allocate ethdevs and > fill brokers with this information? Possible, but not sure it gains much in practice. It would require workarounds to avoid pulling in driver code dependencies (e.g. drivers/bus/vdev/rte_bus_vdev.h).