public inbox for dev@dpdk.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/other Bug 1883] rte_hash with big cap and key size of 64bytes and more can lead to key store corruption
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 20:34:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-1883-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)

http://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1883

            Bug ID: 1883
           Summary: rte_hash with big cap and key size of 64bytes and more
                    can lead to key store corruption
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 26.03
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: other
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: oleksandrn@interfacemasters.com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 340
  --> http://bugs.dpdk.org/attachment.cgi?id=340&action=edit
simple repro

I was experimenting with table size of 2^26 and key size of 64 bytes, and
noticed, that deletion was failing for some earlier added entries, after some
digging it seems like the main problem is overflow in key_store offset
calculation, seems like there are multiple places, but as example

new_k = RTE_PTR_ADD(keys, slot_id * h->key_entry_size);

slot_id is u32, and h->key_entry_size is u32 as well, in my case at high
occupancy slot_id  can be very high(up to 67mil) which multiplied by 80 will
overflow u32 and will overwrite earlier entries.

lazy fix seem to be making h->key_entry_size u64

Attached simple repro.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-02-17 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-1883-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox