From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
Subject: [Bug 192] construct function miss for build with static
library
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 02:15:52 +0000
Message-ID:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: dev@dpdk.org
Return-path:
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev"
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D192
Bug ID: 192
Summary: construct function miss for build with static library
Product: DPDK
Version: 18.11
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: CONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: mk
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: qingfu.cqf@alibaba-inc.com
Target Milestone: ---
I use libdpdk.a to compile a libpmd.so, but I find some construction functi=
on
missed in libpmd.so
There're two file have such issue:
1. drivers/mempool/ring/rte_mempool_ring.c
No function in this file will be call from other place, so if I don't add =
-Wl,
--whole-archive libdpdk.a for gcc , then the construction function will no=
t be
generated to libpmd.so
the construction functions are:
MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_mp_mc)
MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_sp_sc)
MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_mp_sc)
MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_sp_mc)
2. drivers/mempool/stack/rte_mempool_stack.c
Current we can add -Wl, --whole-archive to workaround, or add a null funct=
ion
in this 2 file, but it looks very stupid.
Thank you
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=