From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla@dpdk.org Subject: [Bug 192] construct function miss for build with static library Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 02:15:52 +0000 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D192 Bug ID: 192 Summary: construct function miss for build with static library Product: DPDK Version: 18.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: CONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: mk Assignee: dev@dpdk.org Reporter: qingfu.cqf@alibaba-inc.com Target Milestone: --- I use libdpdk.a to compile a libpmd.so, but I find some construction functi= on missed in libpmd.so There're two file have such issue: 1. drivers/mempool/ring/rte_mempool_ring.c No function in this file will be call from other place, so if I don't add = -Wl, --whole-archive libdpdk.a for gcc , then the construction function will no= t be generated to libpmd.so the construction functions are: MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_mp_mc) MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_sp_sc) MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_mp_sc) MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_sp_mc) 2. drivers/mempool/stack/rte_mempool_stack.c Current we can add -Wl, --whole-archive to workaround, or add a null funct= ion in this 2 file, but it looks very stupid. Thank you --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=