From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/testpmd Bug 2074] [26.11]i40e: mac_filter/test_add_remove_mac_address, remove_mac the change did not take effect.
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 03:28:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-2074-3@https.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2074
Bug ID: 2074
Summary: [26.11]i40e: mac_filter/test_add_remove_mac_address,
remove_mac the change did not take effect.
Product: DPDK
Version: 26.11
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: testpmd
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: hailinx.gou@intel.com
Target Milestone: ---
Environment
Fill in all the following as completely as possible. Use "Unknown" or "N/A" if
required. Use {{braces}} to create fixed width text like this: braces.
DPDK version: Use make showversion or for a non-released version: git remote -v
&& git show-ref --heads
dpdk-26.11-rc1: 9a45341f18a1ab47af7123e63d942b90c1b79f38
Other software versions: name/version for QEMU, OVS, etc. Repeat as required.
OS: Use uname -a
Ubuntu 26.04.1 LTS
Compiler: Use gcc --version or similar
gcc (Ubuntu 15.2.0-16ubuntu1) 15.2.0
Hardware platform: Purley/IceLake etc.
NIC hardware: Niantic/Fortville etc.
NIC firmware: if applicable
driver: i40e
version: 2.30.18
firmware-version: 6.51 0x80004430 1.4002.0
Test Setup
Steps to reproduce
List the steps to reproduce the issue.
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 1-2 -n 4 -a 0000:1f:00.0 -a
0000:1f:00.1 --file-prefix=dpdk_1862818_20261018044623 -- -i --portmask=0x1
set verbose 1
set fwd rxonly
start
show port info 0
set promisc 0 off
clear port stats all
mac_addr add 0 00:01:01:00:00:00
start scapy:
sendp([Ether(dst='00:01:01:00:00:00',
src='52:00:00:00:00:00')/IP()/UDP()/Raw(load=b'XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX')],iface="ens64f0",count=4,inter=0,verbose=False)
Show the output from the previous commands.
tester_scapy: sendp([Ether(dst='00:01:01:00:00:00',
src='52:00:00:00:00:00')/IP()/UDP()/Raw(load=b'XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX')],iface="ens2f0",count=4,inter=0,verbose=False)
tester_scapy:
dut.10.239.252.191:6022: port 0/queue 0: received 1 packets
src=52:00:00:00:00:00 - dst=00:01:01:00:00:00 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw
ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 -
Destination UDP port=53 - Receive queue=0x0
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN
port 0/queue 0: received 1 packets
src=52:00:00:00:00:00 - dst=00:01:01:00:00:00 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw
ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 -
Destination UDP port=53 - Receive queue=0x0
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN
port 0/queue 0: received 1 packets
src=52:00:00:00:00:00 - dst=00:01:01:00:00:00 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw
ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 -
Destination UDP port=53 - Receive queue=0x0
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN
port 0/queue 0: received 1 packets
src=52:00:00:00:00:00 - dst=00:01:01:00:00:00 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw
ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 -
Destination UDP port=53 - Receive queue=0x0
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN TestMacFilter: Test Case
test_add_remove_mac_address Result FAILED: 'Packet has been received on a new
MAC address that has been removed from the port'
Expected Result
Explain what is the expected result in text or as an example output:
Unable to receive packets
Regression
Is this issue a regression: (Y)
Bad commit:
commit 74533d1a8b28d297e70cc0ade3e6c79962d9cff3 (HEAD)
Author: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Aug 24 13:42:06 2026 +0200
ethdev: skip VMDq pools unless configured
The mac_addr_add API describes that only the 0 pool should be passed
unless VMDq has been enabled, though there was no validation so far.
Add such a check, then cleanup the MAC related operations (adding,
removing, restoring).
As a side effect, the net/cnxk does not need to manually reset the
mac_pool_sel[] array.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Version the regression was introduced: Specify git id if known.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-2074-3@https.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
--to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox