From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] introduce security offload library
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 21:43:23 +0530
Message-ID: <c0d76c10-21d7-f872-5e21-791220177154@nxp.com>
References: <20171006181151.4758-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
 <20171014221734.15511-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com> <5506343.0Y9v17d2Dv@xps>
 <4701384.7jGZxAxE1r@xps>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
 <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>, <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
 <radu.nicolau@intel.com>, <borisp@mellanox.com>, <aviadye@mellanox.com>,
 <sandeep.malik@nxp.com>, <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
 <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 <shahafs@mellanox.com>, <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-cys01nam02on0047.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.47])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD422F04
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 18:13:33 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <4701384.7jGZxAxE1r@xps>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Thomas,
On 10/20/2017 3:02 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 16/10/2017 12:44, Thomas Monjalon:
>> 15/10/2017 00:17, Akhil Goyal:
>>> This patchset introduce the rte_security library in DPDK.
>>> This also includes the sample implementation of drivers and
>>> changes in ipsec gateway application to demonstrate its usage.
>> [...]
>>> This patchset is also available at:
>>> git://dpdk.org/draft/dpdk-draft-ipsec
>>> branch: integration_v4
>>
>> If I understand well, this patchset is the result of the group work?
>> Nothing else is needed to merge for the IPsec offload features?
Yes this patchset is a result of a group work.
We do not need anything else to be merged for ipsec offload features.
But Aviad has made some fixes in the ipsec application which may result 
in conflict with the last patch in this series.
So v4 was just rebased over those patches sent by Aviad separately.
We would send a v5 incorporating/answering to all the comments/queries 
rebased over the v2 of the Aviad's fixes to the application.

> 
> Please answer to make sure we are not forgetting something in RC2.
> 
Sorry for the late replies.
I was on PTO for this week. So my responses are delayed.

Thanks,
Akhil