From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] examples/l3fwd: merge l3fwd-acl code into l3fwd Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:36:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1489008729-28784-2-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <2510395.XNuST6rEQr@xps> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258010D907202@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <2922307.MMPdoxV78S@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ravi Kerur , dpdk-dev , "Mcnamara, John" To: Thomas Monjalon , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D102B87 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:36:12 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <2922307.MMPdoxV78S@xps> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/23/2019 5:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 23/01/2019 18:20, Ananyev, Konstantin: >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] >>> 23/01/2019 17:32, Ferruh Yigit: >>>> On 3/10/2017 8:58 PM, rkerur at gmail.com (Ravi Kerur) wrote: >>>>> This patchset merges l3fwd-acl and l3fwd code into common directory. >>>>> Adds config file read option to build LPM and EM tables. >>>>> >>>>> Ravi Kerur (3): >>>>> examples/l3fwd: merge l3fwd-acl code into l3fwd >>>>> examples/l3fwd: add config file support for lpm >>>>> examples/l3fwd: add config file support for exact >>>> >>>> Hi Ravi, >>>> >>>> These l3fwd patches are in patchwork for a long time, I am updating the patchset >>>> as rejected, if it is still relevant please send a new version on top of latest >>>> repo. >>>> >>>> Sorry for any inconvenience caused. >>>> >>>> For reference patches: >>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21696/ >>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21695/ >>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21697/ >>>> >>>> doc one: >>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/24211/ >>> >>> This work was going in the right direction. >>> >> >> Totally agree. >> >>> Konstantin, as the maintainer of the ACL library, >>> do you think it is worth to keep this example as standalone or merged? >> >> My vote is definitely for merging. >> That would give us single l3fwd app with 3 different routing methods >> (lpm, hash, acl) selectable at run-time, plus routing tables in config file. > > OK, so we just need to find a volunteer. There was a "Nice to have - Future" section in Roadmap webpage [1], does it help putting there? Also we talked about GSOC recently, can this be an item for it? [1] http://core.dpdk.org/roadmap/#future > Ravi started the work a long time ago and did not receive enough review. > I'm afraid he's not available anymore. > >