From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Panu Matilainen Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:49:03 +0300 Message-ID: References: To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3333B8D95 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:49:22 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" The number of memory channels is a truly obscure thing as a mandatory command line argument when its really just an optimization. Provide a reasonable default in mempool as suggested by Bruce Richardson and make the -n argument optional in EAL to make DPDK that little bit easier to use for a first-timer. Panu Matilainen (2): mempool: use a better default for number of memory channels eal: make the -n argument optional lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 8 +------- lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.4.3