From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: santosh <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Cavium Octeontx external mempool
 driver
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:42:54 +0530
Message-ID: <d01a01ac-24fe-17a3-a5e5-58a0a397ad38@caviumnetworks.com>
References: <20170824132903.32057-1-santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
 <20170831063719.19273-1-santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
 <5a47127c-47a4-1966-cfec-937ea4e14eb0@caviumnetworks.com>
 <2007007.Y9KMiRGAUg@xps>
 <17f6ef1d-1375-961e-b4d0-175102bf5708@caviumnetworks.com>
 <28848f95-ad92-6ae1-8003-de34e8e7e8aa@intel.com>
 <1dd6d021-b629-adcb-3b84-3fb06d39c480@caviumnetworks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com,
 john.mcnamara@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-bn3nam01on0088.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48F02935
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun,  8 Oct 2017 15:13:17 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1dd6d021-b629-adcb-3b84-3fb06d39c480@caviumnetworks.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>


On Saturday 07 October 2017 10:16 AM, santosh wrote:
> On Saturday 07 October 2017 09:56 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 10/7/2017 4:51 AM, santosh wrote:
>>> On Saturday 07 October 2017 02:25 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>> 19/09/2017 10:29, santosh:
>>>>> Ping?
>>>> Pong
>>>>
>>>> It seems you forgot this series.
>>> This series review is pending and planned for -rc2 window.
>> Hi Santosh,
>>
>> octeontx net pmd has dependency on this patch [1], pushing this to rc2
>> will push net pmd to rc2 as well. And I believe we should get new pmd in
>> rc1 as much as possible.
>>
>> If you can send a new version of this patch at the beginning of the next
>> week, both this and pmd one still can have chance to go in to rc1, can
>> this be possible?
>>
>> [1]
>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/077322.html
>>
> Hi Ferruh,
>
> Yes, 
>
> I will push this pmd v3 series and rebased ONA pmd [1] both
> by early next week for sure.
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/077322.html
>
> +1 to your suggestion.
>
> Thanks.
> [1] 
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/077322.html

Hi ferruh,

I have pushed v2 octeontx PMD [1] just now and has no dependency.

Also pushed v3 octeontx external mempool pmd [2],, its rebased on tip.

Both series are ready to merge for -rc1.

Order for series is, first apply [2] and then [1] on tip.

Thanks.

[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/078071.html
[2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/078060.html