From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] eal: out-of-bounds write Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:38:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1466088738-16990-1-git-send-email-slawomirx.mrozowicz@intel.com> <3354397.Tgjzuq1405@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@6wind.com To: Thomas Monjalon , Slawomir Mrozowicz Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E83E95D7 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:38:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <3354397.Tgjzuq1405@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 20/06/2016 10:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, >> + "All memory segments exhausted by IVSHMEM. " > There is no evidence that it is related to IVSHMEM. > "Not enough memory segments." would be more appropriate. Actually we would hit this issue when all memsegs have been used by IVSHMEM. So I think the message is accurate. Am I missing something? Sergio