From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112D0C4363A for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856012076E for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:20:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 856012076E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DE0C95E; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:20:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AE4C954 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:20:37 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: pz52nLQT9jpUJCTyGq6Lvj09PdnkDZzKoKr+5iTd/ThaQ2LB909Nd9G9ax9u7Yok6MQ5zVBo1p T3asoa6TFT8w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9789"; a="186418816" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,433,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="186418816" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Oct 2020 07:20:12 -0700 IronPort-SDR: vdOYpC3mIvdi1IL0q3R/l3P0fn+MEI5G8yedxjGzo7WYQVb8cq+sXRrJ6o2wkZviqr+XSxSf2O XCR24pAtbk3g== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,433,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="537080150" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.23.197]) ([10.252.23.197]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Oct 2020 07:20:11 -0700 To: Andrew Rybchenko , dev@dpdk.org Cc: Ivan Malov References: <1603957185-29309-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:20:05 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1603957185-29309-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] common/sfc_efx/base: fix prefix in struct member names X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/29/2020 7:39 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > From: Ivan Malov > > In libefx, a struct member name prefix is an abbreviation for the > struct name. Fix mismatch in the case of action set spec struct. > > Fixes: aeacb8458950 ("common/sfc_efx/base: support adding DELIVER action to set") > Fixes: c73d314f790c ("common/sfc_efx/base: support adding VLAN POP action to set") > Fixes: 19aa67196d08 ("common/sfc_efx/base: support adding VLAN PUSH action") > Fixes: 633a89842c17 ("common/sfc_efx/base: support adding MARK action to set") > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov > Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko > Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton Squashed into relevant commit in next-net, thanks. Please confirm it from latest head of next-net. Unfortunately this will cause conflicts to the vendor sub-trees.