From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rao, Nikhil" Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/eventdev: add multi port test to suite Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 17:09:13 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1526552256-56523-1-git-send-email-vipin.varghese@intel.com> <875b1678-b7bc-ca2e-b11f-c9f9bc33b9aa@intel.com> <4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D1F7C93@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: nikhil.rao@intel.com To: "Varghese, Vipin" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Jain, Deepak K" Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2551AFEF for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 13:39:32 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D1F7C93@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Vipin, Thanks for posting V2. On 5/21/2018 4:30 PM, Varghese, Vipin wrote: > Hi Nikhil, > > Thanks for the inputs, I have shared the V2 with suggested changes. As > for** > > > > +        adapter_free(); > > Is it necessary to call adapter_free() above ? > > > > With the changes suggested above > Acked-by: Nikhil Rao > > Yes it not required by current test sequence. > > This is added for safety, in case in previous free is incomplete or > interrupted. > I don't see a case where the previous free can be incomplete or interrupted. Nikhil