From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gowrishankar muthukrishnan Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus/fslmc: use PRIu64 instead of llX in format specifier Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 14:13:28 +0530 Message-ID: References: <5438d3242ebb9d995d0a52a63feba80efd783e6f.1523595487.git.gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4074558.oWdUdNoPZr@xps> <893c8705-858c-336d-c600-c4a23e8fea5b@nxp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Hemant Agrawal , Anatoly Burakov , dev@dpdk.org To: Shreyansh Jain , Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4488A1BBC5 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:43:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3D8h6MW068942 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:43:38 -0400 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2harpd9rws-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:43:37 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:43:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <893c8705-858c-336d-c600-c4a23e8fea5b@nxp.com> Content-Language: en-GB List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Friday 13 April 2018 02:26 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > On Friday 13 April 2018 01:11 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 13/04/2018 07:04, Gowrishankar: >>> -    DPAA2_BUS_DEBUG("--> Map address: %llX, size: 0x%llX", >>> +    DPAA2_BUS_DEBUG("--> Map address: %"PRIu64", size: 0x%"PRIu64"", >> >> You cannot replace hexadecimal by decimal. >> You need to use PRIx64. >> >> > > Now that Thomas has pointed out, I think the log message can be > improved. Len as hex is not helpful and is out of sync with other > messages in this file. > > While on this, I think it should be corrected. > I will fix this. > > @gowrishankar, I will post a patch in reply to your patch - can you > please help me with ppc64le check? I will take care of Hemant's comment. Yup, I check for it. Thanks Shreyansh. > > - > Shreyansh >