From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=c3=b6nnblom?= <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rwlock: introduce 'try' semantics for RD
 and WR locking
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:28:29 +0100
Message-ID: <ebc940ff-c50e-94dc-c7a6-9b1eca73ec09@lysator.liu.se>
References: <1542130061-3702-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
 <1542130061-3702-2-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
 <AM6PR08MB367213976F11F1C407FF195398BE0@AM6PR08MB3672.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>, "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
 Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [130.236.254.3])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4F51B4FB
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:28:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6B240004
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:28:32 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR08MB367213976F11F1C407FF195398BE0@AM6PR08MB3672.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 2018-12-19 07:37, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
>> b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
>> index 3fe78260d..8b1593dd8 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
>> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>>   	rte_mp_request_async;
>>   	rte_mp_sendmsg;
>>   	rte_option_register;
>> +	rte_rwlock_read_trylock;
>> +	rte_rwlock_write_trylock;
> I do not see the other RW lock APIs in this file.
> 

They, just like those added, are static inline functions, will not 
result in any symbols in any shared objects and thus shouldn't be in any 
version.map file.