From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Remy Horton <remy.horton@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/24] net/ixgbe: enable port detach on
 secondary process
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:35:45 +0100
Message-ID: <ef2fd480-5e7f-572b-aec2-7b5a9d718a11@intel.com>
References: <20180607123849.14439-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
 <20180626070832.3055-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
 <20180626070832.3055-11-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
 ferruh.yigit@intel.com, benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com,
 narender.vangati@intel.com
To: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, thomas@monjalon.net,
 anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF231B454
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:35:48 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20180626070832.3055-11-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>


On 26/06/2018 08:08, Qi Zhang wrote:
[..]
>  static int eth_ixgbevf_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv __rte_unused,
>  	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
>  {
> +	struct rte_eth_dev *ethdev;
> +
> +	ethdev = rte_eth_dev_allocated(pci_dev->device.name);
> +	if (!ethdev)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
> +		return rte_eth_dev_release_port_private(ethdev);
> +
>  	return rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_probe(pci_dev,
>  		sizeof(struct ixgbe_adapter), eth_ixgbevf_dev_init);
>  }
>

Is calling of rte_eth_dev_release_port_private() from the probe function 
intentional? To me it looks like the code has been pasted into the wrong 
place..