From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: fix missing curly braces Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:19:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160713092419.14425-1-viktorin@rehivetech.com> <7046512f-49fa-30b4-9238-318617cc04be@redhat.com> <20160713194214.19622a67@jvn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jianfeng Tan , Yuanhan Liu , Huawei Xie To: Jan Viktorin Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6A12BDC for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:19:39 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20160713194214.19622a67@jvn> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 07/13/2016 07:42 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:27:18 +0200 > Maxime Coquelin wrote: > >> Hi Jan, >> >> On 07/13/2016 11:24 AM, Jan Viktorin wrote: >>> GCC 6 is complaining and seems to be correct here. >>> >>> virtio_user_ethdev.c:345:2: error: >>> this =E2=80=98if=E2=80=99 clause does not guard... [-Werror=3Dmislea= ding-indentation] >>> if (rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, VIRTIO_USER_ARG_PATH) =3D=3D 1) >>> ^~ >>> >>> virtio_user_ethdev.c:348:3: note: >>> ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented >>> as if it is guarded by the =E2=80=98if=E2=80=99 >>> if (ret < 0) { >>> >>> Fixes: 404bd6bfe360 ("net/virtio-user: fix return value not checked") >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin >>> --- >>> >> I already fixed it yesterday: >> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14780/ > > Sorry, I didn't find it quickly. My fault. Thanks. Oh no problem! Better having two fixes than none :) Thanks, Maxime