Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix dmadev incomplete ABI validation

[fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>]

On 7/2/2026 2:52 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 at 03:35, fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/2/2026 1:01 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 at 10:11, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 at 15:24, <datshan@qq.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From: datshan <datshan@qq.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix dmadev incomplete ABI validation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chengwen Feng (2):
>>>>>   dmadev: fix incomplete configuration validation
>>>>>   test/dmadev: add config and vchan validation tests
>>>>>
>>>>>  app/test/test_dmadev_api.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>  lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c    | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>>  2 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This series is not versionned, but I guess this is a new revision.
>>>> Don't forget to flag your submissions with a version number in the future.
>>>> I marked the previous patches as superseded in patchwork.
>>>>
>>>> Also provide a high level summary of the differences between versions.
>>>>
>>>> All of those steps are listed in the contributing guide, I suggest
>>>> (re-)reading the whole guide, with a highlight on:
>>>> https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html#steps-to-getting-your-patch-merged
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, I'll try to find some time to review this week.
>>>
>>> Well, enforcing *now* that some fields are 0 is actually breaking ABI
>>> for existing applications.
>>> This change should be deferred to 26.11, and backporting to a LTS is
>>> not possible.
>>
>> OK
>> BTW: Should I submit another version in 26.11 cycle or do nothing?
> 
> I'll mark those patches as Deferred in patchwork.
> That's enough, I will apply them after 26.11-rc0.

Thanks

> 
>