From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] doc: add template for release notes 16.11 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:00:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1467733310-20875-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1467733310-20875-2-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Mcnamara, John" , "dev@dpdk.org" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5436CBF for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:00:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f126so170870813wma.1 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 05:00:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi John, On 07/06/2016 01:48 PM, Mcnamara, John wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz >> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:42 PM >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/18] doc: add template for release notes >> 16.11 > > Hi, > > This is useful but it is probably a little bit early since it should include the shared lib versions from the final 16.07 release notes. > > Also, is it intentionally part of a patchset for a "software parser for packet type"? It should probably be separate. Sorry, I should have add an explanation: I just wanted to have the patchset applying on current head (16.07-rc1) without conflicts. Indeed some commits add some entries in the release note. I agree, at the end, this commit should not be part of the patchset. Regards, Olivier