From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] vfio: change to use generic multi-process channel Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 15:39:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1515643654-129489-5-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <1521535809-47337-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "dev@dpdk.org" To: "Tan, Jianfeng" Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7AC1C7FE for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 16:39:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 05-Apr-18 3:26 PM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote: > Hi Anatoly, > > An obvious action would be change rte_mp_request to > rte_mp_request_sync(). Before sending out the new patch, do you have any > other comments for this patch? Hi Jianfeng, I don't think i do, but i'll have another look at it just in case, when i get time. > > Hi Thomas, > > Several patches will change vfio; may I know the your preferred apply > sequence? (I'm trying to find out which patch shall rebase on; of > course, I can wait until other patches are applied) > > - http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/37258/ > - http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/37152/ > - http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/37082/ > - http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/37047/ > > Thanks, > Jianfeng > -- Thanks, Anatoly