From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Conole Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/26] eal: No panic on hugepages info init Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:48:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170225160309.31270-1-aconole@redhat.com> <20170227161811.12309-1-aconole@redhat.com> <20170227161811.12309-4-aconole@redhat.com> <20170228142504.GA15368@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B97B2C23 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:48:06 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20170228142504.GA15368@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> (Bruce Richardson's message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:25:04 +0000") List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Bruce Richardson writes: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:17:48AM -0500, Aaron Conole wrote: >> When attempting to scan hugepages, signal to the eal.c that an error has >> occurred, rather than performing a panic. >> >> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole >> --- >> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c | 6 ++++-- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c >> index 18858e2..4d47eaf 100644 >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c >> @@ -283,9 +283,11 @@ eal_hugepage_info_init(void) >> struct dirent *dirent; >> >> dir = opendir(sys_dir_path); >> - if (dir == NULL) >> - rte_panic("Cannot open directory %s to read system hugepage " >> + if (dir == NULL) { >> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Cannot open directory %s to read system hugepage " >> "info\n", sys_dir_path); >> + return -1; >> + } > > Minor nit. > The error message should go on a line on its own, without any breaks to > make it easy to "grep". This should also eliminate the checkpatch > complaint about it being too long. Yes, will fix it for v6. -Aaron