From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05818C46467 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 15:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3592C40691; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:46:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C260D40042 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:46:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673883968; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=WOyT4UYZ9AwtXii6q+QEuSAKx/WT+GGQd124O3mzS80=; b=JQIz/fjbesTZ4H8w3hi8sJhQhU9AIQ3NWaJWTD1QHhI9BcC9wpIGeVS920f+Q64FmQqfNa XZMR35ahGLIlZQoaTtiZ+k01Qa5GYhl+SbAuH7x50d4Vv83yM6tGXgoeKyEgoucEmkJLWh WMgDnbwVOpXwX4pU4ZKonmp56BTVo/E= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-62-ipc0eovxNd6jqeIVv6HUcg-1; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:46:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ipc0eovxNd6jqeIVv6HUcg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87AAE3815F61 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 15:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTPC1VM0NT (unknown [10.22.32.87]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 524B91121314 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 15:46:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Minutes of Technical Board Meeting, 2022-07-13 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:46:05 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Members Attending: 6 * Aaron Conole (chair) * Hement Agarwal * Maxime Coquelin * Nathan Southern * Stephen Hemminger * Thomas Monjalon NOTE: The Technical Board meetings take place every second Wednesday on https://meet.jit.si/DPDK at 3 pm UTC. Meetings are public, and DPDK community members are welcome to attend. Agenda and minutes can be found at http://core.dpdk.org/techboard/minutes * DPDK Userspace Event updates ** CfP submissions are coming in. More expected within the next week. ** Remote presenters can be accommodated (but not preferred, although remote speakers doing pre-recorded is preferred in that case) ** Remote attendance is an option - access to all sessions isn't clear at the moment. First day stuff (hackathon, TB meetings, etc. aren't recorded) TBD, but likely will not be accessible to remote attendees. ** Some complimentary passes have been approved for qualified individuals ** Sponsorship packages were approved ** Some travel / transportation recommendataions are forthcoming to the website * LF server backup ** Nathan submitted request ** Last message from Johnson @ gowdy.net is that the ticket is in process ** Are any additional ticket requests? - Seems no ** No ETA for completion ** Thomas says when it should be available we can do some testing and see if we missed anything. * Tech writer update ** Discussion with a candidate between Thomas, Bruce, and Nathan ** Candidate represents a group, which was a surprise ** Asked for a proposal, but the proposal did not have a breakdown, just a flat payment for 3 months. ** Group wants hourly information, and an "out" in case the work isn't sufficient. ** Thomas concern is that the plan is to work "full time" but we are probably not able to absorb full time work. Better if they would work something like 1 wk/month because that is probably closer to the workload we estimate. ** Maybe if they are able to split the work in small tasks we can work out a schedule, but the current proposal doesn't have that. ** Need an audit of work to do to generate tasks list. ** Do we pay for that? Discussion *** Probably do, this is work and we are asking them to do it. *** Need to have a bigger discussion about how to come up with such an estimate, etc. *** Maybe other projects have some data that we can use for coming up with an estimate? *** Q: Has LF paid for this work before? If so, what is the rate, etc.? -- Discussing backlog -- * Security process ** Nothing new * UNH CI / Testing ** Presented the gov board status ** UNH Git caching issue *** Shallow clone should be sufficient for git pulls at UNH *** Two solutions - git cache being out of sync is a rare case anyway *** Maybe with self-retest this isn't an issue ** Question is UNH still on their schedule? ** There is a question about using UNH with OPI, doing some kind of global API on top of DPDK. There is a need for a lab, and the suggestion is UNH. ** Thomas is monitoring the discussion ** Not sure about whether the teams would/could overlap * Doc maintenance ** Need to see what will happen with tech writer candidate * Bugzilla status ** Waiting on responses ** BZ doesn't seem overwhelmed, but needs maintenance