From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:16:23 -0500
Message-ID: <f7timycsajc.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>
References: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE23F512773@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <CADNuJVqhYB8ycjZAhoFhs-+NOSj0Spwh0nfO-K6iogxeSzhqUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: "Mcnamara\, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, "dev\@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
 Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, "Dumitrescu\,
 Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>, "Xu\, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
 Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>, "Zhang\,
 Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
 "De Lara Guarch\, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>, "O'Hare\,
 Cathal" <cathal.ohare@intel.com>, "Yigit\, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
 Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>, Timothy Redaelli <tredaelli@redhat.com>
To: Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BE091
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:16:26 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <CADNuJVqhYB8ycjZAhoFhs-+NOSj0Spwh0nfO-K6iogxeSzhqUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 (Jay Rolette's message of "Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:42:05 -0600")
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io> writes:

>>    * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
>>      Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
>>      testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
>
> We do @ infinite io.

+1.  Red Hat also uses the LTS releases.

I'm curious why there are three?
Isn't 16.11 deprecated now that 18.11 is released?  Maybe I
misunderstand that part.