From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] net/ena: update ena_com to the newer version Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:42:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20180611095416.12250-1-mk@semihalf.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, matua@amazon.com, Rafal Kozik To: Michal Krawczyk , Marcin Wojtas , Guy Tzalik , Evgeny Schemeilin Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5921C1DDBB for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:42:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180611095416.12250-1-mk@semihalf.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 6/11/2018 10:54 AM, Michal Krawczyk wrote: > ena_com is the HAL provided by the vendor and it shouldn't be modified > by the driver developers. > > The PMD and platform file was adjusted for the new version of the > ena_com: > * Do not use deprecated meta descriptor fields > * Add empty AENQ handler structure with unimplemented handlers > * Add memzone allocations count to ena_ethdev.c file - it was > removed from ena_com.c file > * Add new macros used in new ena_com files > * Use error code ENA_COM_UNSUPPORTED instead of ENA_COM_PERMISSION > > Signed-off-by: Michal Krawczyk > Signed-off-by: Rafal Kozik Can you please check following? .../dpdk/drivers/net/ena/base/ena_com.c: In function ‘ena_com_aenq_intr_handler’: .../dpdk/drivers/net/ena/base/ena_com.c:1833:21: error: variable ‘timestamp’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable] unsigned long long timestamp; ^~~~~~~~~